Bihari and Delhite: Who is without brain?


Delhi election, 2015, will prove who is genius. Long back, when I was in Pune, most of my friends and faculties used to ask why Lalu Yadav kept wining in Bihar. They were surprised that why people choose Lalu who made Bihar uncivilized and undeveloped. In a reply, I used to tell that development and corruption is never the issue in elections. We (Bihari) were still voting him because of his contribution in 1977 and because he saved life of Loknayak JP. This used to make them silence as in India people, except me, have no courage to tell anything against Gandhi Jee and JP.

Today, I am excited and waiting for the result of Delhi election. I am excited to know what my friends (some of them were with me in Pune) from Delhi will tell after AAP’s government formation, if APP wins. Due to Arvind Kejriwaal, Delhi faced election within a year. We know how much an election costs. At least, I am proud of Lalu that he gave a stable government in Bihar, he supported his house wife and made her CM. Arvind Kejriwaal went to Gujraat just before the election and started talking about their problem, he went to Varanasi and told he would never leave Vanaras. Now, he forgets everything. This makes me surprised whether Delhi people are blind like Dhritrashtra or they are brainless.

Many of my friends told that Modi is not a good person for PM as he left his wife and still not bothering about her. Now, how will any one justify Arvind Kejriwaal as CM when he left whole Delhi just for a Lok Sabha seat from Varansi. He forgot his whole fight against corruption of Sheela Dikshit and just gave priority to his personal ego clash with Modi. Defeating Modi was important for him rather than solving the problem of Delhi. The result on 10 Feb will tell whether Bihari is genius or Delhite. After 16 years, I will have a smile on my face while discussing politics with any one in India who are supporting AAP.

Parmit Kumar Singh

AK is the Euler’s number and Anna Hazare is Euler.


Recently, there was allegation on AAP by AVAM for converting black money into white by accepting donation from fake companies. Instead of accepting their gaffe, AAP came with a logic and raised question about timing of allegation. In an interview with Bharkha Dutt, Mr. Arvind Kejriwaal told “मैंने तो बरखा से पैसा लिया। अब बरखा कहाँ से पैसा लायी, ये जाने का काम मेरा नहीं सरकार का हैं. वो पकड़े अगर आपने गलत किया है”. So the whole episode showed that his honesty (also the honesty of his associates) is indubitable and unalterable. It is similar to ex (the Euler’s number) as differentiation of ex is ex and it does not change upon the degree of differentiation. For example: d (ex)/dx = ex. The d (d(ex)/dx/dx which is d2(ex)/dx2, and so on. This term ‘e’ (natural logarithm) was defined by eminent mathematician Euler. Anna is like Euler, he created such an honest man like AK that nothing can affect his honesty, even his corruption. Instead of commenting on the AK’s fault, Anna wrote a blog about failure of Modi’s government. What will AK tell this timing? The hidden meanings of his explanation are following:

  1. His point was that he is not different than any other politician. He wanted that BJP should have done this after election. In other words, after election, he is not going to bother about allegation. He will finish his term without thinking about any thing.
  2. He will accept money from ISI and will challenge PM to catch ISI if he can. In other words, for all his failure or wrong work, only PM will be responsible.

Parmit Singh Dhurandhar

केजरीवाल


रिश्ते जो,
गुनाहों की चादर में लिपटे हुए हैं,
अंधेरों में भी पर्दा रखते हैं.
आँखों में, हया-शर्म,
कुछ भी नहीं है उनके,
फिर भी जमाने से घूँघट रखते हैं.
कौन कहता है की,
शातिर होतें हैं कातिल,
अरे इस बस्ती से तो,
एक -दो ही केजरीवाल बनते हैं.

परमीत सिंह धुरंधर

Kashmiri politician are the most honest politician in India: as per Arvind Kejriwaal


Recently, I read an article where Arvind Kejriwaal asked many questions from the BJP state president, Delhi, for his involvement in some company. My only point is why he raised such things against politician who are fighting against him at present time. At the time of Lok-Sabha election, he jumped against Modi in Gujrat, same thing he is doing here. All the other time he is just silent or he does not care. He never tells anything against Mulayam Singh, Sharad Pawar and even Om Prakash Chautala. He told nothing against Jayalalitha and Krunanidhi. Now he is silent against Congress since BJP is the main challenger.

It is beyond my capacity to understand. In my view, he is the most dangerous person because if somebody is against him does not mean that the guy is most corrupt.

Does AK feel that people from Bollywood are more honest? He never tells how much illegal money they have or about their connection with underworld.

Why did he not suggest the people of Kashmir about any corrupt politician in just finished election? I think the politicians from Kashmir are most honest one as per AK.

Parmit Singh Dhurandhar

Probability of secularism


You are alone in a jungle and suddenly you see a girl who has similar condition like you. You approach her by thinking to find some solution together to get out of this problem. When both of you are chatting and knowing each other, the rain starts and suddenly there is a thunderbolt in the sky.

Case1: What is the probability that the girl will kiss you?

There is a new state created in India. Hindus are as minority.

Case2: What is the probability that majority will accept Hindu as CM?

Which case has a higher probability of occurrence?

Parmit Kumar Singh

Modi jee missed his first masterstroke


The announcement of Bharat Ratan for Atal jee brought the true face of BJP that they are not different than congress. L.K. Advani keep telling that he wrote so many letters to Manmohan Singh for considering Atal jee name. However, no one in BJP consideredLate-P.-V.-Narasimha-Rao P.V. Narasimha Rao’s name for this award along with Atal jee. It was Narasimha Rao who awarded Atal jee “Padma Vibhushan” in 1992 even if he was PM from the Congress party. It is well known fact that he was trying for Pokharan but was unable due to USA and so he had a personal talk with Atal jee before leaving the office. He requested him not to give up.

It was an opportunity for BJP and Modi to defeat Congress in their game. It is well known fact that Soniya jee don’t like Narasimha Rao. It was a nice opportunity for BJP to win the heart of Telgu people by showing its bigger heart as late N.T.R had shown by supporting Narasimha Rao in election as he was the first PM candidate from south. The same thing was done by Bal Thakre in case of Pratibha Patil. However, What BJP did here is very much similar what Congress did by not considering a great leader like Atal jee for Bharat Ratan during their reign.

Mohan Bhagwat told that Modi is like Abhimanyu and this Abhimanyu missed this opportunity. (Photo was taken from web by google search.)

Parmit Kumar Singh

Mission-44 and its role in Bharat Ratan to Atal Bihari Vajpayee jee


Long back RSS aligned in favor of Atal Bihari and Lal Krishna Advani and supported them to suspend Balraj Madhok, the tallest leader of Jan Sangh at that time. Those who don’t know Balraj Madhok and consider Atal Bihari Vajpayee as a good speaker, my advices to them are to ask people who have seen Balraj Madhok. The Nehru’s era is incomplete without mentioning of three leaders: Rammanohar Lohiya, Shyama Prasad Mukherkjee and Balraj Modhak. Lohiya was critical at his policies towards economy, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee was against of his national view and Balraj Modhak was against his policies towards Kashmir. In fact, it was Shyama Prasad Mukherjee who created the opposition in true sense. He was the first who tried to educate people against wrong policies of Nehru. He had this vision, which no one else had that time. Later on, C. Rajgopalchari, Prushotam Das Tandon and many other leaders left Congress but they were unable to win. Therefore, he joined the hand to the RSS to create a strong opposition. He brought the RSS into politics. Later on Lok Nayak Jay Prakash Narayan took his vision and seeked students support against emergency. After SPM, it was Balraj Madhok who made Jan Sangh stronger and there were 33 MPs during his presidency. When Shyama Prasad was in the Congress, Balraj had his own party for raising the issues of Kashmiri Pandit. He joined the hand with SPM just to make a stronger platform.

First time when BJP came in power, they used to cry that they had no majority to fulfill the Hindutava agenda. However, today, when Modi jee has full power, the BJP government choose Atal Bihari Vajpayee ahead of Shyama Prasad Mukherjee. There was no chance for Balraj Madhok as RSS don’t like to show his name and face during the RSS’s or BJP’s meeting; however, they still show Shyama Prasad Mukherjee and Din Dayal’s photos. What is the reason for ignoring Shyama Prasad? The reason is the hunger for power at cost of Hindutva. The RSS’s ideology of Hindutva is fake. That’s the reason they dropped Balraj Madhok who was a major voice for Kashmiri Pandit. And, this time they dropped Shyama Prasad for the Bharat Ratan. They want to form a government. For this they have to join the hand with either PDP or NC. The Bharat Ratan award to Shyama Prasad was dependent on the mission -44 in Kashmir’s election. They waited till the result and dropped his name due to the failure of mission-44. Giving award to Shyama Prasad would have indicted that BJP is still behind article 370. It was Vajpayee who always helped the RSS to drop these controversial points when it was needed. Moreover, recognizing Atal jee disconnected BJP and RSS from the Jan Sangh’s ideology. BJP is a party, which is totally dependent on the RSS whereas the RSS was like younger brother before Shyama Prasad and Balraj Modhak.

For his “congress-mukta Bharat”, I was expecting Bharat Ratna for Ram Manohar Lohiya, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, Balraj Modhak, Chandrashekhar and P.V. Narshimha Rao at this time and not for Atal Jee.

Parmit Kumar Singh