गलत पति चुनने से लड़की का जीवन बर्बाद हो जाता है, कैसे ?
बोलो दोस्तों। बोलो दोस्तों।
क्यों की उसकी जवानी, उसकी सौतन ले लेती है.
आज अलका लम्बा की जवानी शीला दीक्षित ने ले ली.
क्यों की उसकी नींदे उसकी सौतन सोती है.
आज से अलका लाम्बा की रातों की नींद, शीला दीक्षित जी सोयेंगी।
परमीत सिंह धुरंधर
लालू राज लाएंगे, लालू राज लाएंगे,
केजरीवाल की सहायता से, लालू राज लाएंगे।
खोखला अहंकार को स्वाभिमान बता रहें,
ये केजरीवाल जी हैं, भैंस को गाय बता रहें।
फिर मिल बैठ के संग सब चारा खाएंगे।
केजरीवाल की सहायता से, लालू राज लाएंगे।
चाहे राबड़ी जी बैठे, या सत्ता पे नितीश जी,
जनता की तिजोरी में चूना फिर लगाएंगे।
केजरीवाल की सहायता से, लालू राज लाएंगे।
परमीत सिंह धुरंधर
पाप दो तरह से करते हैं. एक जवानी में पाप करके बुढ़ापे में सुधार कर लेते है. ये लोग उच्च कोटि के होते हैं, जैसे वाल्मीकि, रावण, दुर्योधन, अंगुलिमाल डाकू, नरेंद्र मोदी और अरविन्द केजरीवाल। दूसरा तरीका होता है पूरी जिंदगी अच्छे रह के बाद में, बुढ़ापे में फंस जाते हैं इस रोग में और मज़ा भी आता है अपने पुण्यों को क्षीण-क्षीण होते देख के. जिद रहती है की हमारे हैं, लूटने दो. मिथ्या पाल लेते हैं की हम ही सर्वश्रेष्ठ। ऐसे लोग ऊचाई से गिरते – गिरते, पतन की उस पेंदी तक जाते हैं जहाँ से कोई पुण्य करने पे भी पुण्य नहीं मिलता। इसे दाग लगा देना कहते हैं. इसलिए पहले के लोग इस तरह का काम होने के बाद आत्मगलानी में या तो घर- संसार छोड़ देते थे या आत्महत्या करते थे या आत्मशुद्धि के लिए प्रयाग जाते थे. ऐसे लोगो की श्रेणी में भीष्म पितामह, द्रोणाचार्य, अश्वथामा, देवगौड़ा, वी. पी सिंह और नितीश कुमार आते हैं.
आज सारे बुद्धिजीवी लोग दूसरी श्रेणी की महिमा करें में लगे है. पहले के समय में लोग प्रथम श्रेणी के लोगो की महिमा ज्यदा करते थे. हाँ, एक बात कहना भूल गया की एक तीसरी श्रेणी होती है जिसमे सिर्फ एक ही व्यक्ति हुआ, विश्वामित्र, जिसने पाप, पुण्य, फिर पाप करने के बाद फिर पुण्य अर्जित किया.
परमीत सिंह धुरंधर
नए जवाहरलाल हैं,
अपने केजरीवाल।
सबको निकाल बहार करेंगे,
खुद करेंगे राज.
मुफ्त मिलेगा खाना सबको,
मुफ्त मिलेगा आनाज,
लेना है अगर सब मुफ्त तो,
फिर मत पूछो सवाल।
बोतल नयी है पर,
उसमे वो ही पुरानी है शराब।
तुम लो बस तीन आना,
और हम लगाएं गुलाब।
नए जवाहरलाल हैं,
अपने केजरीवाल।
सबको निकाल बहार करेंगे,
खुद करेंगे राज.
अन्ना को छोड़ा, भूषण को तोडा,
योगेन्द्र यादव को दी है लात.
आज भी नहीं सुधरेंगे तो,
कल ये भी हो जाएंगे श्यामा प्रसाद।
नए जवाहरलाल हैं,
अपने केजरीवाल।
सबको निकाल बहार करेंगे,
खुद करेंगे राज.
परमीत सिंह धुरंधर
Recently, there was allegation on AAP by AVAM for converting black money into white by accepting donation from fake companies. Instead of accepting their gaffe, AAP came with a logic and raised question about timing of allegation. In an interview with Bharkha Dutt, Mr. Arvind Kejriwaal told “मैंने तो बरखा से पैसा लिया। अब बरखा कहाँ से पैसा लायी, ये जाने का काम मेरा नहीं सरकार का हैं. वो पकड़े अगर आपने गलत किया है”. So the whole episode showed that his honesty (also the honesty of his associates) is indubitable and unalterable. It is similar to ex (the Euler’s number) as differentiation of ex is ex and it does not change upon the degree of differentiation. For example: d (ex)/dx = ex. The d (d(ex)/dx/dx which is d2(ex)/dx2, and so on. This term ‘e’ (natural logarithm) was defined by eminent mathematician Euler. Anna is like Euler, he created such an honest man like AK that nothing can affect his honesty, even his corruption. Instead of commenting on the AK’s fault, Anna wrote a blog about failure of Modi’s government. What will AK tell this timing? The hidden meanings of his explanation are following:
Parmit Singh Dhurandhar
रिश्ते जो,
गुनाहों की चादर में लिपटे हुए हैं,
अंधेरों में भी पर्दा रखते हैं.
आँखों में, हया-शर्म,
कुछ भी नहीं है उनके,
फिर भी जमाने से घूँघट रखते हैं.
कौन कहता है की,
शातिर होतें हैं कातिल,
अरे इस बस्ती से तो,
एक -दो ही केजरीवाल बनते हैं.
परमीत सिंह धुरंधर
Recently, I read an article where Arvind Kejriwaal asked many questions from the BJP state president, Delhi, for his involvement in some company. My only point is why he raised such things against politician who are fighting against him at present time. At the time of Lok-Sabha election, he jumped against Modi in Gujrat, same thing he is doing here. All the other time he is just silent or he does not care. He never tells anything against Mulayam Singh, Sharad Pawar and even Om Prakash Chautala. He told nothing against Jayalalitha and Krunanidhi. Now he is silent against Congress since BJP is the main challenger.
It is beyond my capacity to understand. In my view, he is the most dangerous person because if somebody is against him does not mean that the guy is most corrupt.
Does AK feel that people from Bollywood are more honest? He never tells how much illegal money they have or about their connection with underworld.
Why did he not suggest the people of Kashmir about any corrupt politician in just finished election? I think the politicians from Kashmir are most honest one as per AK.
Parmit Singh Dhurandhar
The announcement of Bharat Ratan for Atal jee brought the true face of BJP that they are not different than congress. L.K. Advani keep telling that he wrote so many letters to Manmohan Singh for considering Atal jee name. However, no one in BJP considered
P.V. Narasimha Rao’s name for this award along with Atal jee. It was Narasimha Rao who awarded Atal jee “Padma Vibhushan” in 1992 even if he was PM from the Congress party. It is well known fact that he was trying for Pokharan but was unable due to USA and so he had a personal talk with Atal jee before leaving the office. He requested him not to give up.
It was an opportunity for BJP and Modi to defeat Congress in their game. It is well known fact that Soniya jee don’t like Narasimha Rao. It was a nice opportunity for BJP to win the heart of Telgu people by showing its bigger heart as late N.T.R had shown by supporting Narasimha Rao in election as he was the first PM candidate from south. The same thing was done by Bal Thakre in case of Pratibha Patil. However, What BJP did here is very much similar what Congress did by not considering a great leader like Atal jee for Bharat Ratan during their reign.
Mohan Bhagwat told that Modi is like Abhimanyu and this Abhimanyu missed this opportunity. (Photo was taken from web by google search.)
Parmit Kumar Singh
Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, the leader who created the meaningful opposition in an independent India and who was the face of the RSS supported BJP till now, was not considered for the Bharat Ratna” award by Modi government in Delhi. The government decided to give this to Mahamana Madan Mohan Malaviye jee, who was senior, and Atal Jee who was junior to Shyama Prasad. By this way the RSS and BJP tried to erase Shyama Prasad legacy in Indian Politics.
I am not here to tell that he was the youngest VC of the Calcutta University who invited Tagore for convocation. I am here to ask a question that why BJP and Modi did not choose his name for the Bharat Ratan.
एक राष्ट्र में दो प्रधान, नहीं चलेगा-नहीं चलेगा। एक देस में दो विधान, नहीं चलेगा-नहीं चलेगा। This was the slogan which was popular than any movie dialogue that is popular today. It was Shyama Prasad who did that without proper party and workers. It was Shyama Prasad who initiated the opposition against Jinna hidden agenda for Pakistan when no one else in the Congress had thought that Jinna would be successful. He resigned from Nehru’s cabinet to oppose the 1950 Delhi pact and made BJS with the help of the RSS and thus he brought the RSS in politics. However, today, BJP choose Atal jee and Mahamana to erase him and his political legacy. In my view, this was the biggest mistake this government did. It was an opportunity for the BJP to prove that it is different than the Congress and to prove that it is important to debate on the article 370. Awarding the Bharat Ratan to him would have proved his point on the article 370 was correct. His vision on united India or on Jinna was correct.
Then, why did not BJP choose him? The answer is the article 370. By dropping his name, BJP sent a hidden signal to political parties in Kashmir that they don’t care for the article 370. In other words, BJP is trying to prove that the article 370 is not related to Hindutva and nationalism. From here and now, I don’t think BJP will use Shyama Prasad name like Balraj Modhak. The Bharat Ratan for Shyama Prasad might have helped BJP to gain something in Bengal, but they choose to drop him just because their interest lies in Kashmir. Shyama Prasad was more potent and stronger leader of Hindu Mahasabha than Madan Mohan jee. BJP choose both (Atal jee and Mahamana jee) name to keep its fake Hindutva alive and to keep opposition silent. By choosing Mahamana’s name, BJP tried to satisfy the strong supporter of Hindutva. However, BJP is neither interested in Hindutva nor it is interested in Madan Mohan or Atal jee legacy. They just want to grab power at any cost and want to make history by doing something in Kashmir. Now the future will reveal where BJP will go in next four years with respect to Bharat Ratan as they don’t have so many leaders to give this award during their regime. Will they consider Shayam Prasad in next year or they will choose people from other filed or no nomination at all. There might be chance that will choose some other people from history like Madan Mohan jee. Is there any chance for L. K. Advani as he was a fire brigade for the RSS ideology at one time? (The image was taken from web in google search which showed the photo gallery of him on http://www.bjp.org)
Parmit Kumar Singh
वो कहते हैं की आमिर का फोटो बल्गर नहीं,
जो खुद किरण राव को बुर्क़े में रखते हैं.
हमें क्या अब सैफ समझायेंगे की मोहब्बत क्या है,
जो मोहब्बत की शुरुआत भी तालाक से करते हैं.
परमीत सिंह धुरंधर
hotcrassa 